π§ͺ Testing Strategies β
Building confidence in your code through effective testing.
Testing pyramid β
/ E2E \ Few, slow, expensive
/ Integration \ Some, moderate
/ Unit Tests \ Many, fast, cheapTest types β
| Type | Scope | Speed | When to use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | Single function/class | ms | Business logic, pure functions |
| Integration | Multiple components | seconds | API endpoints, DB queries |
| E2E | Full user flow | seconds-minutes | Critical paths, smoke tests |
| Contract | API boundaries | ms | Microservices, external APIs |
| Snapshot | UI output | ms | Component rendering |
| Performance | Load/response time | varies | Before release, critical paths |
Writing good tests β
- Arrange, Act, Assert β Setup, execute, verify
- Test behavior, not implementation
- One assertion per test (when practical)
- Use descriptive test names:
should_return_404_when_user_not_found - Tests should be independent β no shared state between tests
- Tests should be deterministic β same result every time
What to test β
- Happy path (expected behavior)
- Edge cases (empty input, null, max values)
- Error cases (invalid input, network failure)
- Boundary conditions (first, last, off-by-one)
What NOT to test β
- Third-party library internals
- Trivial getters/setters
- Framework boilerplate
- Implementation details that may change
Test doubles β
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Mock | Verify interactions (was this called?) |
| Stub | Return predetermined data |
| Spy | Record calls for later assertion |
| Fake | Simplified working implementation (in-memory DB) |
Coverage β
- Aim for 80%+ on business logic
- 100% coverage β bug-free code
- Measure coverage to find gaps, not as a target